The 2020 census is coming up faster than you might think. This is important to consider now because there is a lot of work goes into planning a successful census count, which needs to be taken into consideration three years in advance.
Because I have been interning with the City of Green Bay Mayor’s Office this summer, I have been given the opportunity to learn more about this eventful project. The 2020 census is especially crucial for many reasons, in which I will point out.
The Chief of Staff for the City of Green Bay (in which I intern for) asked me to listen to a podcast called Stand and Be Counted by On the Media. I was given this task because it talks about the key components of the census while discussing gerrymandering. All of this is very important towards a healthy democracy. Because I am also working on finding alternative early in-person absentee voting locations for Green Bay, learning about these issues are important for my knowledge.
After listening to this podcast, I thought it would be important to share the information I learned with the rest of you because the press lacks coverage on this important subject. This is also the perfect way for me to promote your participation in the upcoming census!
The census affects the way that gerrymandering is decided. This is a process of states redrawing the district lines every 10 years in accordance with the census data. This is often times used for political party advantages. It is important to make sure that the district lines match the shifting demographics to ensure a proper democracy. If one is not given the proper opportunity to try to vote out a person that represents them, what kind of functioning democracy is this??
The podcast that I listened to provided a simple way to look at how this operation works through what can be known as packing and cracking. This means that the parties will do their best to pack all of the other side’s votes in to as few districts as possible while claiming the surrounding ones for itself. In retrospect, they could also try to crack and divide them as powerful as they can across as many districts as possible.
This system of gerrymandering dates back to the nation’s birth, which is still in effect today. It was brought to the attention by many back in 2010 when the Republicans captured massive houses and governorships. Stand and Be Counted mentions that this broke politics in a very serious way by not being representative in a way that it is supposed to be.
During this time, the Republicans used sophisticated mapmakers that were armed with data to draw precise and surgical lines. Because of this, 2012, 2014, and 2016 would have zero swing in the U.S. House. As the podcast quotes, “We do not want our politics reduced to an every decade arms race that is fought between two parties over redistricting” (Stand and Be Counted 2017).
In accordance, there were many lopsided districts, in which some Democrats did not put up a person for a seat. This means the Republican party would have no challengers. It is important to think about this because it does not represent a healthy democracy.
We can take this into consideration with our very own state of Wisconsin. The Supreme Court has never been willing to intervene in gerrymandering due to the rights of states. The podcast mentions Wisconsin as a poster child for this issue. The state ordered for new state assembly lines after the 2010 census. This was the first time in 30 years that this called partisan gerrymandering unconstitutional.
How exactly did the court determine this? Many law professors and other professionals took a look into this and came up with a term known as, “efficiency gap”. This attempts to determine when gerrymandering has gone too far. Through the process of data analyzing, there is a percentage created of people whose votes had been squandered.
If the efficiency gap is accepted, the podcast concludes that there would be six other states in violation of gerrymandering. This can make a big difference when it comes to voting through different representations in districts.
We can take a look at how this has changed over time when examining the years between 1972 to 2000. Here, the median efficiency gap in all state legislative elections in the U.S. was zero. 2010 came around and the percentage was off of the charts.
Now, what exactly made this change?? This is something that should be looked into to better fix the issue with our democracy
This means that the 2020 census will shape the elections that are yet to come. Being able to count every person in America will allow us to better see the shifting populations. With this, we will be able to adjust the number of electoral votes and congressional seats accordingly for representative democracy.
An important concern with the census arose when a drafted executive order was leaked in January. This proposed that the director of the Census Bureau should include questions to determine U.S. citizenship. It is important to consider that the census was made to count every person in America, regardless of citizenship.
The concept of answering immigration status scared many people away from the census. Because of this, there were many advertisers telling immigrants that filling out the census would not endanger them. Having this order signed could also encourage many legislatures to claim that the census results were flawed if people are scared away from it.
Because census data is fed back to cities, counties, and mayors, an under count could cause the leader to notice that the data does not match up with what they are familiar with. This in turn can go viral and make democracy look even worse.
The podcast then continued on to make a very valid point. If we have a failed census, why don’t we privatize it and turn it into a commercial operation through apple, google, or etc. so that people will do it well because they are getting paid to do it.
This is bad to consider when thinking about census data as a public good. As soon as something is privatized, you have to build a profit. People also think differently when you are trying to make money off of something. This can make the idea of politics more greedy than it already is.
While it may seem as though the census is only about politics, it is not. The podcast mentioned a good quote to consider from Abraham Lincoln, which recites, “The census allows us to better judge what to do and how to do it” (Stand and Be Counted, 2017).
The data received from the census will help businesses decide where to build grocery stores, determine how billions of dollars are funneled into states for schools, roads, etc. It also says something about the society as well. Being able to know more about the society we live in will allow one to better govern it as well.
The podcast mentioned a great example from history about how the census was useful during the civil war. General William Sherman used the 1860 census data to plan part of his March to the Sea. He needed to find out where the crops were in order to feed his army. He used census data on the maps and was able to know where he was going, what he would run into, as well as roughly how many people would be in those areas.
While listening to the podcast, I was also learned about another important time in history for the census. It mentioned that counting Spanish speaking people in the 1970s was disastrous and confusing. Because of this, there was an estimated 5.3 million people under counted in the United States.
This under count was frustrating for advocates seeking more federal aid for an under served population because such identity of Hispanic was not yet clear at the time.
When it came to the question of race, there were only the categories of white, black, American Indian, and a variety of Asian choices available. The states recommended that Mexican Americans check the white race box.
Puerto Ricans had the same concerns during this time, in which both groups made an alliance. When thinking about which label to choose, there were many concerns for the “Spanish Speaking” term because many activists worried this would not cover the many Latinos who did not speak Spanish.
They also worried about the a label of “brown” due to many Latinos not seeing themselves as this color. This issue made many of these people feel too foreign or un-American. This alone goes against the sense of freedom that America promises.
So how exactly did the label of Hispanic become so nationally known? Many Latino activists at this time were from New Mexico, where the title was already very popular. In retrospect, many people across the country did not recognize this term.
This called for a need in media push. The census was very crucial in this situation as well because the activists would need the data to get national attention to advertise and sell the concept for people to mark themselves as Hispanic.
This was an important time for social experimenting with very ambiguous identity titles. This reflects more than just categorizing. It demonstrates one’s culture, values, and experiences of being an underrepresented minority population.
As the world is continuing to turn, so is our society. The census ensures the confidence on how to better govern our country through several factors. I hope that being able to learn more about this subject will not only allow you to think more conceptually about it, but to make sure you participate in the 2020 census!